Big “I” Urges Congress to Repeal 1099 Filing Provision.

In the months following passage of the health care overhaul law, the Big “I” and others have deemed many provisions from the 2,000 plus page bill problematic, the latest of which is the new IRS Form 1099 reporting requirement for businesses. This provision is slated to take effect in 2012 and would require all businesses to file a Form 1099 for any business-to-business transaction for goods or services over $600 (cumulative throughout the tax year). Businesses will be forced to track down and record the name, address and taxpayer identification number of each vendor. At the end of the tax year, businesses will have to file a Form 1099 with the IRS and send a copy to each vendor.

The Big “I” and many others in the small business community oppose this mandate citing the massive amounts of resources that will be poured into new record keeping, accounting and compliance procedures. The mountain of paperwork required to comply will divert resources and prevent investment in job growth and business expansion.

The Big “I” recently sent a letter <http://na.iiaa.org/Email_Communications/08.12.10/letter.pdf>  outlining this position to the Chairmen and Ranking Members of the tax-writing committees as well as Congressional leadership asking for repeal of the provision. In addition to its own letter, the Big “I” signed onto similar letters authored by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the American Society of Association Executives (ASAE), both of which will be sent out in early September.

The Big “I” letter notes that this provision is unrelated to health care and was added only to partially offset the cost of the bill at large.

The additional reporting requirements are aimed at closing the “tax gap,” or the amount of money owed to the federal government but never collected. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) scored this provision as raising $17 billion for the federal government but many question this prediction since tax evaders will likely continue to be successful. The provision is expected to dramatically increase the cost of doing business for entities of all sizes, especially hitting small businesses hard. Additionally, with the increased costs at the IRS associated with enforcing this mandate, any net revenue collected by the federal government will be negligible. 

Bipartisan support recognizing the damage this provision could do to the economy is growing in Washington. Most notably, the Senate has scheduled a vote for Sept. 14 on a clean repeal amendment authored by Sen. Mike Johanns (R-Neb.). This proposal also recently garnered support from across the aisle from Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.). If that amendment is voted down, a proposal authored by Sen. Bill Nelson (D- Fla.) will be brought up to modify the 1099 reporting provision by repealing it for businesses with less than 25 employees, and for larger businesses, raising the $600 threshold to $2,000. The Big “I” strongly prefers a full repeal.

 Since the House and Senate are both currently in recess until mid-September, nothing more can happen legislatively until they return.

However, the Big “I” is working diligently to build support for repeal and will keep members abreast of events as they unfold.

Ryan Young (ryan.young@iiaba.net <mailto:ryan.young@iiaba.net> ) is Big “I” senior director of federal government affairs

Posted in Life and Health Related, Personal Insurance: House, Auto, etc., Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Big “I” Supports Estate Tax Relief Legislative Effort

 Urges Sentate to adopt Kyl/Loncoln amendment.

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 14, 2010 – The Independent Insurance Agents & Brokers of America (IIABA or the Big “I”), today commended United States Senators Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) and Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) for introducing an amendment to H.R. 5297, the “Small Business Lending Fund Act of 2010,” that would permanently reform the federal estate tax.

The Kyl/Lincoln amendment would permanently set the estate tax rate at 35%, with a $5 million exemption amount phased in over 10 years and would be indexed for inflation. In addition it would include an option for taxpayers inheriting assets in 2010 to either retain this year’s estate tax rate, which is zero percent, with a “carry over basis” or file under the provisions of the bill.

“We applaud Senators Kyl and Lincoln for their efforts to bring attention to the plight of family-owned business and many independent insurance agents who are deeply impacted by the estate tax,” says Robert Rusbuldt, Big “I” president & CEO. “The Big ‘I’ supports their amendment and urges Congress to significantly reform the estate tax to encourage investment and growth in small business. This reform should come in the form of a decrease in the estate tax rate and/or increase in the exemption amount and should be indexed for inflation for the future.”

The estate tax is currently 0% but will return January 1, 2011 with a 55% rate and a $1 million exemption.

“The estate tax disproportionately impacts small and family-owned businesses that serve local communities and are the backbone of our economy,” says Charles Symington, Big “I” senior vice president of government affairs. “Without real permanent relief, family-owned small businesses are stalled when trying to plan ahead and/or make important business decisions about their futures. Many of these businesses are asset-rich, yet lack liquidity to pay estate taxes when an owner passes away.” 

In 2009 the Big “I” and its coalition partners, over forty business trade associations that formed the Family Business Estate Tax Coalition, voiced their support for a similar bipartisan amendment sponsored by Senators Kyl and Lincoln that was passed by the Senate during consideration of the congressional budget.

Safe Harbor Benefits is a proud member of the Big “I”, the nation’s oldest and largest association of independent insurance agents, and other various local, state and national industry associations.  We join such organizations in an effort to continue education for staff members and to support their Policital Action Committees.  These associations are working hard to protect and improve the insurance and financial industries in order to benefit our clients – and our clients are our top priority. 

 

Posted in Financial | Leave a comment

WHO DECIDES ON HEALTH CARE VALUE?

The most important element in implementing ObamaCare will be the requirement for health insurers to meet what is called a medical loss ratio.  This requires health insurance plans to split the dollars they receive from insurance premiums into two buckets, say Newt Gingrich, former Speaker of the House and founder of the Center for Health Transformation, and David Merritt, vice president and national policy director at the Center for Health Transformation. 

For instance: 

  • Depending on the type of insurance coverage, 80 percent to 85 percent of premiums must be spent on either medical services or “activities that improve health care quality.”
  • This bucket includes everything from doctor visits, hospital stays and surgery to prescription drugs and medical equipment.
  • It also includes programs to help patients cope with chronic diseases and reminders to take prescribed medications.
  • The remaining 15 percent to 20 percent of premiums falls into a smaller bucket of “administrative” expenses like overhead, marketing, profits, compensation and agent commissions.  

Regulators will soon decide which specific activities fall into which bucket: 

  • Forcing a wide range of services and benefits into the smaller administrative bucket puts them in direct competition with other critical aspects of a health insurer’s business, as health plans will be compelled to cut back on those activities labeled “administrative” to meet new federal requirements.
  • Plans will be forced to choose between priorities that benefit patients — such as preventing health care fraud and reducing unnecessary services — and other priorities like creating new technological innovations or upgrading equipment.  

The implications for patients are enormous, say Gingrich and Merritt. 

Is giving patients access to a team of nurses to discuss and monitor their health really an administrative function?  What about a fraud-prevention program that targets criminal providers who endanger patient care?  State regulators at the National Association of Insurance Commissioners have indicated that they think both are.  And bureaucrats at the Federal Department of Health and Human Services will rely heavily on their recommendations. 

Bureaucrats now have the power to force private health plans to make business decisions based on regulations rather than on what is best for company or customer health. This kind of governmental micromanaging of health care — seen nowhere else in our business sector — is anathema to the free market.  More importantly, it endangers the lives and well-being of millions of Americans, say Gingrich and Meritt. 

Source: Newt Gingrich and David Merritt, “Who Decides on Health-Care Value?” Wall Street Journal, July 29, 2010.

Posted in Life and Health Related | Leave a comment

Bill to Repeal Health Care Law’s 1099 Paperwork Mandate Filed

Bill to Repeal Health Care Law’s 1099 Paperwork Mandate Filed
Sen. Mike Johanns of Nebraska has introduced S. 3578 that would repeal a costly tax reporting provision included in the new health care law. The provision forces all businesses, charities, and state and local governments to file 1099 forms if they purchase $600 or more in goods from another business throughout the year. This includes everything from supplies and shipping costs to phone and internet services. Senator Johanns’ bill, the Small Business Paperwork Mandate Elimination Act, would repeal this provision and prevent a massive new paperwork requirement from being imposed on businesses, which could increase 1099 filings by 2000 percent.

 “This mandate forces businesses to waste staff time and resources on paperwork that even the IRS says will likely be of little value,” Johanns said. “One more mandate that stifles small businesses at the same time that Washington urges them to hire workers. For businesses already struggling to emerge from a recession this would be particularly burdensome, requiring government paperwork for common, everyday purchases. It is nothing more than a government-imposed obstacle to economic growth and job creation.

Additionally, a division of the IRS has already stated the agency will ‘face significant challenges’ in handling the mountain of 1099 reports that will result from this new requirement, and has predicted an increase in erroneous penalties on our citizens. This provision has nothing to do with health care, and I hope my colleagues will support its repeal to protect small businesses across the country.”

Source: Press Rlease from Sen. Johanns


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The hype about Obama’s health care reform plan has died down, leaving many asking, “Where do we go from here?”.

WASHINGTON – The first stage of President Barack Obama’s health care overhaul is expected to provide coverage to about 1 million uninsured Americans by next year, according to government estimates.

That’s a small share of the uninsured, but in a shaky economy, experts say it’s notable.

Many others — more than 100 million people — are getting new benefits that improve their existing coverage.

Overall costs appear modest at this point, split among taxpayers, employers and individuals who directly benefit, although the biggest part of the health care expansion is still four years away.

For weeks, the White House has been touting the new law’s initial benefit changes, even as Obama dares Republicans to make good on their threat to repeal his signature social policy achievement. Now, a clearer picture is starting to emerge from the patchwork of press releases.

In 2014, government tax credits will help uninsured workers and their families pay premiums, and Medicaid will take in many more low-income people. Eventually, more than 30 million will gain coverage, sharply reducing the number of uninsured and putting the nation on a path to coverage for all citizens and legal immigrants.

Political salesmanship and an attempt to address some glaring health insurance problems are key elements of the strategy to explain the initial changes resulting from the law. After battling for a year to pass the legislation, Democrats desperately wanted to have tangible accomplishments to point to in high-stakes congressional elections this fall. But they also have to deflect lingering questions, often stirred up by opposition candidates, and doubts about the effectiveness of the overhaul and its costs.

“We’ve seen increasing numbers of people losing their health insurance, particularly in this recession,” said Sara Collins, vice president of the Commonwealth Fund, a New York-based health research clearinghouse. “Providing this early relief will help people who are particularly affected by the downturn.” Collins reviewed coverage estimates in federal regulations for The Associated Press.

Among the beneficiaries will be many people locked out of insurance because of medical problems.

The Raether family of suburban Milwaukee will gain from two of the changes: Elimination of  lifetime coverage limits and a ban on insurers turning away children in poor health.

Four-year-old daughter Mira, who was born prematurely and has kidney problems, exhausted the lifetime limit on her parents’ policy earlier this year. Mira now has temporary Medicare coverage because of a kidney transplant, but her parents were worried about what would happen when they have to get her back on private insurance.

“A huge weight has been lifted,” said Sheryl Raether, the mother. “She has ongoing health care needs, and I was afraid she’d hit another lifetime limit.” Medicare not only covers seniors, but people of any age with permanent kidney failure.

The major early coverage benefits include:

• Allowing young adults to stay on their parents’ coverage until they turn 26. In 2011, an estimated 650,000 young people who would otherwise have been uninsured will gain coverage. Another 600,000 will benefit by switching from individually purchased policies to less costly, more comprehensive employer plans. The number with coverage will grow in 2012 and 2013.

_A health plan for uninsured people with pre-existing health conditions. From 200,000 to 400,000 could benefit in 2011, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The government may limit enrollment if $5 billion allocated through 2013 starts to run out, as projected. Beginning in 2014, insurers will be required to accept all applicants, regardless of medical history.

_Ending lifetime limits on coverage, and restricting annual limits. As many as 20,400 people a year hit lifetime limits, as did Mira Raether. Many more — an estimated 102 million — are in plans that impose such limits and will no longer be able to do so.

• Requiring insurers to cover children with medical problems. An estimated 51,000 uninsured children are expected to gain coverage. Another 90,000 children who have been excluded for coverage for a particular condition — asthma, for example — will also benefit.

Many Americans covered through employers won’t see the changes until Jan. 1, the start of their next health plan year. That means 2011 will be the first year that the early benefits are fully in place.

What that entails for costs is a matter of intense speculation. A recent survey of employers by Mercer, a major benefits consultant, found that 42 percent expect an increase of 2 percent or less, while one-fourth expect an increase of 3 percent or more. Government estimates are generally lower.

Beth Umland, research director for Mercer, said employers were expecting health cost increases averaging about 6 percent a year before the law. “Now they are looking at an additional 2 or 3 points, so that 6 percent can become a 9 percent, and that seems to be above their comfort level,” she said.

Dave Osterndorf, chief health actuary for the Towers Watson consulting firm, said large employers will respond by passing on costs to their workers. “These first few changes, in and of themselves, will not dramatically change the way employers look at the provision of health benefits,” he said. “Employers will feel part of the impact, and employees will feel part.”

Some coverage gains may take a while to add up. For example, Blue Cross Blue Shield Kansas City reports brisk sales to small businesses by advertising Obama’s new tax credit for those who offer coverage. CEO Tom Bowser said more than 60 of the 227 small firms signed up so far did not previously offer health benefits.

“Small groups are one of the toughest markets we have,” said Bowser. “Because of the economy, more and more were dropping coverage entirely, and we’ve able to reverse that.”

By RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR, Associated Press Writer Ricardo Alonso-zaldivar, Associated Press Writer Mon Jul 5, 3:38 pm ET

Posted in Life and Health Related | Leave a comment

Americans are all trying to eat healthier…

and we at Safe Harbor are no different.  Follow this link for some interesting information:  

http://shine.yahoo.com/channel/health/what-should-americans-eat-experts-announce-8-new-food-rules-1792205/

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Safe Harbor Benefits Anniversary

Beverly Hernandez, our Home and Auto Insurance specialist, is celebrating her two-year anniversary with Safe Harbor on June 16.  Please join us in wishing her Happy Anniversary.  We are lucky to have Beverly as part of our team!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

How will you spend your life savings?

Will you enjoy retirement?  Will you leave something to you children and grandchildren?

We all have these goals, but so many of us do nothing to protect them which is why we at Safe Harbor are big believers in Long Term Care Insurance (LTCi).  Many people are unaware of the risk to their retirement though an aging population and huge federal deficits engulfing Social Security and Medicare, lead us to believe that people with assets will be expected to pay (or their estates will re-pay) the government for the care they receive.

According to an annual survey conducted by John Hancock Life Insurance Company, at least 70% of people who live to age 65 will require some long-term care services at some point in their lives.  The latest statistics show that the average stay in a nursing home is 876 days, or about two and half years. At approximately $200/day (today’s average cost of a nursing home) the tab comes to over $175,000.  Even a basic benefit policy of $100 per day will go a long way toward paying for care.

Almost all of us have a relative or a friend with a relative receiving long term care assistance, so we know this a real risk we face. The agents at Safe Harbor are here to educate you and help you find the protection you need. Call us when you are ready to talk.

Posted in Financial, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

FREE Medical Screenings

At Safe Harbor Benefits, we strive to continually offer our clients ways to save money whether it be on insurance premiums or through non-related insurance activities. Below you will find information for free medical screenings.  We will post more as we become aware of them.

For those suspecting they may have asthma – http://www.wfaa.com/news/health/Free-asthma-testing-available-in-May-92906334.html

For free prostate screenings –

Medical Center of Arlington is hosting a FREE to the Community- Men’s Prostate (PSA) Screening.

Saturday  June 5,  8:00 am – 12pm  —  First Come, First tested!   

Blood Draw  ONLY – NO Physical Exam included.

3219 Omega Drive, Arlington TX. 76014 – on Omega Drive behind MCA – closest to Mayfield road.

Men 40 and over or with Cancer in their family history.

For more information, you can contact Kim Colon, Clinical Oncology Nurse, 817 465 3241 ext. 3015 or Deborah Su, 817 472 4764, Deborah.su@hcahealthcare.com.

Safe Harbor Benefits is in no way affiliated with the above group(s) and makes no claim to their accuracy or professional experience.

Posted in Life and Health Related, Useful Info | Leave a comment

Protect more than your skin on vacation…protect yourself.

With the excitement of an upcoming vacation, many of us forget to protect ourselves from unexpected medical costs that could result in financial hardship. Or we may mistakenly think that our health insurance coverage will cover all costs incurred during a medical emergency. But with most policies, the costs of transportation is not covered, whether it be from one hospital to another in the foreign country or back to the United States. Travel insurance can cover the gaps that your regular policy does not cover during international travel and since these policies are only temporary, the premiums are extremely cheap. The article below shows how the purchase of a travel policy saved a family from over $100,000 in medical bills as well as another woman. You may have to ask yourself, can you afford to not purchase a travel policy?

http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2010-05-12-travel-insurance_N.htm

Visit us at www.safeharborinsurance.com or call (817)226-3372 to purchase travel insurance.

Posted in Life and Health Related, Uncategorized | Leave a comment